5E Instructional Framework

5E Instructional Framework

On this page you will find:


Quick Read

  • Required 5E lesson sections are present in the content (Prepare, Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate, Evaluate, Differentiation, Extension)

  • 5E instruction correctly reflects LEGO Education phase definitions.

  • Lesson includes teacher Support box:

    • Key Objectives

    • Things You Will Need

    • Additional Resources,

    • Educational Standards

  • Lesson includes student Material box:

    • Student Worksheet (not all lessons have a Student Materials box)


Best Practices

  • LEGO Education uses the following phase definitions for the 5E’s:

    • Engage, students discuss and connect to the lesson topic and challenge (problem.)

    • Explore, students build or use LEGO bricks.

    • Explain, students explain what they’ve done and demonstrate their learning.

    • Elaborate, students deepen their understanding by extending and applying lesson concepts in new activities.

    • Evaluate, students and teachers assess student progress toward lesson objectives and skill development.

  • To make sure you understand the 5E’s and how to recognize the framework in LEGO Education lessons, look at the explanations and guides under Important Details.


Important Details

LEGO Education 5E Instructional Framework

The 5E Instructional Model was developed by Biological Science Curriculum Study (BSCS) in 1987. Based on constructivist theory, it’s a well-proven and widely-used model that’s considered to be very effective for STEAM learning.

LEGO Education’s interpretation appears in the chart below.

5E Instructional Framework

Find it in LEGO® Education lessons

5E Instructional Framework

Find it in LEGO® Education lessons

Engage

  • Accesses students’ prior knowledge to engage their interest in the concept they’re exploring.

  • The teacher or a curriculum task engages students with a new concept through short activities that promote curiosity and elicit their existing knowledge.

  • The activities should connect past and present learning experiences, expose prior conceptions, and direct students’ thinking toward the desired learning outcomes of current activities.

Teachers ignite a topic-related discussion that’s relevant to students, leading them to a clear challenge or problem to solve.

Explore

  • Students participate in an activity that facilitates conceptual change.

  • Students use a common base of activities that facilitate conceptual change, and identify current concepts (i.e., misconceptions), processes, and skills.

  • Students may complete lab activities that help them use prior knowledge to generate new ideas, explore questions and possibilities, and design and conduct a preliminary investigation.

Students explore and work toward possible solutions to the given problem by experimenting with building, programming, and testing creations.

Explain

  • Students generate an explanation of the concept they’re investigating.

  • Students focus attention on a particular aspect of their engagement and exploration experiences, and have opportunities to demonstrate their conceptual understanding, process skills, or behaviors.

  • Teachers may directly introduce a concept, process, or skill, and have students explain their understanding of it.

  • Critically, teachers or the curriculum may guide students toward a deeper understanding of a concept.

Students are asked to contemplate what they’ve discovered, explain their findings, and discuss their results with others.

Elaborate

  • New experiences challenge and deepen students' understanding of the concept they’re exploring.

  • Teachers challenge and extend students’ conceptual understanding and skills by introducing new concept-related activities.

  • Students develop a deeper and broader understanding, gather more information, and improve their skills.

Students are challenged to elaborate on what they’ve learned by applying their knowledge to a more advanced problem (potentially leading to a new 5E cycle).

Evaluate

  • Students assess their understanding of the concept they’ve been exploring and their developing skills or abilities.

  • Teachers evaluate their students’ progress toward achieving the learning l objectives.

Students are encouraged to evaluate and give feedback on their own and peers’ progression toward achieving the learning objectives. Teachers may also use observation checklists and other formative assessment tools to evaluate students' progression.

Section-by-Section 5E Lesson Guidance

5E lessons follow a specific structure.

See the details of a Teacher’s Lesson plan, a Main Lesson Pan Column Overview (5E’s in the classroom, step -by-step), and a Student Learning Experience (the 5Es in student facng content, step-by-step) by clicking the relevant dropdowns below.

Teacher Lesson Plan

Teacher Lesson Plan

Lesson Feature

Content of the Feature

Lesson # and Title:

Lesson numbers reflect their position in a unit, although teachers use lessons in any order they wish.

Lesson storyline:

1–2 sentences of student-facing content that captures the story of the lesson and invites students in. Usually corresponds to a lesson image. Also appears in the student learning experience, so changes should be made in all instances.

Lesson time:

45–90 mins unless otherwise directed.

Lesson difficulty:

Follows a pattern progressing from Beginner to Advanced. This pattern may be applied across units OR within units, but it always progresses the same way. below in units. In some units, Lesson 1 is marked Beginner.

  • Typical 5-lesson unit

    • lessons 1–4 in a unit= Intermediate

    • lesson 5 in a unit = Advanced

  • Typical 7-lesson unit

    • lesson 1 = Beginner

    • lessons 2-6 = Intermediate

    • lesson 7 = Advanced

Grade level:

Enter as provided by the project. Maybe a single grade level or a range from below

  • PreK–K

  • 1–2

  • 3–5

  • 6–8

Teacher Support Sidebar: Key learning objectives

Use the LEGO Education Assessment Methodology or other project guidance to create maximum 3 bullets that reflect the target standard learning in the lesson, which is often only one standard of several listed.The bullets should align narrowly to that learning and the observable progress indicators that will appear in Evaluate vs. the broader learning of the standard. Objectives are for teachers only.

Follow best practice for writing learning objectives. They should

  • Use measurable verbs, e.g. explain, identify vs. understand.

  • Measure one type of performance per outcome. Students will X and Y is not measurable as they may succeed with X, but not with Y.

  • See Measurable Learning Objectives.

Teacher Support Sidebar: Things you will need

Usually the pertinent LEGO Education set; Because the Additional resources section currently only accepts PDF links, list URLs, research articles/images, or physical materials in Things You Will Need. Other items provided by project.

List details or directions in the Prepare section for Materials.

Teacher Support Sidebar: Additional resources

This box can only include hyperlinks to PDF content, such as a Minifigure Bio, Self-Assessment rubric, or Building Instructions.

Teacher Support Sidebar: Educational standards

Enter or paste the standards using the guidance provided on a project. Some standards may require instruction and others are organically incorporated. Extension standards are not explicitly taught.

  • One standard is often the learning focus of the lesson for which we include instruction and progress monitoring. Learning will be captured in the 1–3 lesson learning objectives. List the number and text of the standard.

  • Sub-standards are embedded in our lesson instructional design, but have no objective and are neither monitored nor assessed. For these, list ONLY the standard number

    • NGSS ETS—These repeat across a grade and are always covered by lessons that incorporate the engineering design process.

    • CSTA or ISTE—These repeat across lessons and are always covered in a lesson with programming.

    • CCSS Language Arts or Math—These have been generally applied and mostly repeat across a grade. They assume that students always use speaking/listening during discussion or explanation AND often use math skills such as counting or shapes when building.

    • Extension: A different CCSS ELA OR Math—This activity is a brief suggestion to teachers about how to extend the lesson for either ELA or Math.

As you develop lessons, query if

  • The standards don’t seem a good fit for the model, the key concepts, or any other aspects of the Curriculum Overview.

  • You prefer to use a different Extension standard.

Student Material Sidebar box

Text on the lesson plan page is boilerplate. Content of the associated worksheet is automatically generated to present the images and text from the student-facing APP steps OR learning experience EXACTLY. This offers the teacher an option to view, reference, or share it with students on paper.

Main Lesson Plan Column

Main Lesson Plan Column

Lesson Feature

Content of the Feature

Prepare

  • Bulleted list for steps and materials teachers will need before teaching the lesson.

  • Bullets vary by project, starting with project boilerplate such as references to the Teacher Support box or the standards.

  • Other bullets may include

    • Background provided to teachers

    • Prior knowledge or skills students should have

    • Vocabulary to preteach

    • Building and programming experience

    • Other Prior knowledge

  • Background knowledge assumes that teacher’s core curriculum/materials offer the first source of truth. We are telling teachers what concepts or terms are important and providing minimal specific suggestions to help them develop it with students. We are neither providing nor recommending any sources beyond the core curriculum. Use concepts and terms that will support research if teachers choose to do so, and language that will be easy to share with the target age students.

  • All background and prerequisite knowledge should reflect the age and cognitive development of the target students. What might they need to know? Keep this narrowly focused on what students need to know for the specific learning in the lesson vs. all the background we could happily give about a topic.

  • Any provided answers should be written in language and cognitive level of the target students for easy sharing.

  • Be mindful of Science accuracy, and of avoiding any inaccuracy when simplifying for younger students. For example, when we say that “bees like nectar” or “plants get animals to move pollen for them,” we are suggesting that these organisms have opinions, feelings, and intentions. See Permissions and Credits for more about effective research.

  • Vocabulary terms will not be defined. Limit to 6 essential terms, 2–4 is better. These may include terms in the lesson standard. IF we exclude a word from readability because it is domain-specific or too difficult, make sure to list it here.

  • Building and Programming Experience: Consider and list the prior experience students need to succeed, including any Start tutorials available in the student content. Identify any specific lessons where they can acquire the necessary LEGO building or programming experience. Use resources for a particular product, such as Unit overviews, Help sections of a student app, and student tutorials to develop ideas. Refer teachers to any useful resources. Also see resources such as those listed below:

    • Coding Blocks in SPIKE Essential

    • Coding Concepts in SPIKE Essential

    • Computational Thinking in SPIKE Essential.

  • Open-project lessons, which are the last one in a unit, have no provided models, programming stacks, or inspiration images. For prior experience, suggest a related existing lesson OR other support to help teachers and students develop the building and programming experience. Use the resources referenced above for support.

Part A

This is the first 45-min section of the lesson. It contains the meat and most important parts of the instruction, because we know that many teachers will not use Part B. They may not have time, may need the sets for a different class, or may not find it useful.

Incorporate the appropriate boilerplate, such as This lesson contains a Part A and a Part B. Both are important to access the full learning of the standard. If time is limited, review both parts to choose elements that meet your students’ needs.

Engage

This section follows a repeating pattern to lead students into the learning experience (possibly in an App).

  • Repeat/summarize the storyline/first activity. This consolidates information from APP Step/Cards 1–3.

  • The story offers the narrative entry into the story and invite students to join the minifig character or solve a problem for it, frames the specific challenge students will receive, and provides opportunities for social-emotional learning as students connect to the character’s situation and wants. The characters are assigned intentionally for coverage and to align with their biographies.

  • Stories are written at student language and cognitive level. When revising for subject-matter accuracy, readability, instructional coverage, or other minor reasons, maintain the purposes of the story, update it across its several appearances.

  • Encourage students to THINK about the main character’s problem as prompted in the student experience. If repeating content in a student app, match it exactly.

  • Supply answers to support teachers, writing them in student-facing complexity and language for easy sharing. We recommend that you write the student questions first and work backwards to the lesson plan.

  • Boilerplate to distribute sets and devices

Explore

This section follows a repeating pattern to lead students through the build/program section of the learning experience.

  • Capture the essence of the steps/cards in the student-learning experience. Text here should match the student learning experience text as closely as possible, but you may tweak for flow or grammatical structure and to avoid repeating text that is boilerplate here.

  • Present a specific building idea related to the challenge and the required evidence of learning. Provide any necessary support regarding LEGO elements that support the learning, e.g., an element to use as a piece of pollen that can be transferred.

  • Include sharing routines and opportunities to reflect and then iterate.

  • Reference and build on any sample model programs or models provided in the lesson plan. These are additional to the base model or programming ideas presented to students directly and give teachers ideas of what the solutions might look like without saying there is a right answer. Open-project lessons have no inspiration images or sample programs in the student experience.

  • Model images AND programming stacks are created collaboratively between SME writers and model/tech designers.

Explain

This section follows a repeating pattern to lead students through the Explain section of the student learning experience. It is often where the meat of the standards’ instruction occurs. For that reason, it appears in Part A and again in Part B, so that teachers are sure to use it no matter how they allocate time.

  • Direction to gather students

  • Direction to introduce sharing and explanation, followed by 1–3 bullets that closely mirror or exactly repeat the student-facing text. It’s essential that these bullets capture the intended standard learning if this is where it occurs. For example, if the standard requires students to “ask questions,” we need them to do that during explain. If it requires them to “develop a model that mimics the function of an animal in pollinating plants,” we need them explain the model’s function here to demonstrate their learning.

  • Direction to guide sharing

  • Boilerplate guidance for how to continue Explain in Part B if desired.

PART B

This is the second 45-min section of the lesson. It offers the opportunity to repeat/continue Explain, which is often the meat of the standard. The other sections offer additional building opportunities to extend and continue the learning, but in theory only Evaluate is needed to complete the standard instruction.

Explain

Can be continued or repeated from Part A if the learning requires it.

Elaborate

This section follows a repeating pattern to lead students through an additional challenge in the student learning experience. These challenges help students extend learning beyond the lesson to related topics, aspects of the standard, or even their own lives. Includes

  • background students may need to complete the Elaborate challenge(s); 1–3 sentences max

  • summarize the additional challenge, using the language in the student learning experience as closely as possible. This text can be slightly rephrased here as needed, but we recommend that you write the student-facing content first and work backwards to add background needed. Keep the subject-area learning at the cognitive and language level of the target students AND closely connected to the lesson standard. Be mindful of introducing new challenges that will require a lot of additional background.

  • Elicit sharing and learning

  • Prompt clean up

Evaluate

  • This section follows a repeating pattern to enable teachers to monitor student progress toward the required learning for the key learning objectives.

  • Elicit discussion about student thinking and process. Often boilerplate in a lesson series.

  • Section may include Exit Tickets, Observation Checklists, Self- or Peer Feedback, and other evaluation methods. Some content may be in PDFs and some included on the lesson page. Content in PDFs should be referenced in the lesson plan, likely with boilerplate.

For Observation Checklists, see the example below.

Observation Checklist

  • Bullet 1: Boilerplate to connect the learning objectives with the checklist we provide.

  • Bullet 2: Boilerplate to create and share a scale for ranking the progress observed.

  • Bullet 3: 1–3 sub-bullets that tell teachers what they should see if students meet the learning objectives. Remember that many elementary teachers will appreciate being told what an “accurate” model looks like – even if they know, we are saving them time.

Differentiation

May differentiate the overall lesson difficulty, e.g., reading or programming, or the specific subject-area content, with a narrow focus on the learning required by the standard. In all cases, target the main lesson learning and the age/cognitive development of the target students.

  • Simplify….. 1 (2 if necessary) bullets to describe a way to simplify the required challenge 1 learning for students who are struggling.

  • Increase… 1 (2 if necessary) bullets to describe a way to extend or increase the learning for students who are ready.

Extension

  • BRIEF (1–2 sentences max) suggestion for one or more activities to meet an ELA or Math standard OR another set of subject area curricula. When Math is included, prioritize CCSS Math to find best fit and use ELA elsewhere (because Math is harder to align). For ELA, incorporate varied learning and delivery modalities to enable access and success for all students. Even a writing activity can be delivered orally, through a video, etc.

  • Boilerplate reference for time

  • List the standard

Student Learning Experience

Student content appears in different forms, from worksheets to Apps to learning cards. The student-facing text is usually repeated exactly in the downloadable Student Worksheet and repeated/mirrored in the Lesson Plan. Start with the student learning experience to develop student-facing language and concept load, then run readability check and revise, and finally paste back to the teacher Lesson Plan with any support teachers will need to facilitate learning.

The directions and number of steps below will vary according to project and student-facing content, but the progression from Engage to Evaluate will be similar. Students will engage, then build, then share their learning, then elaborate on it.

Student Learning Experience

Student content appears in different forms, from worksheets to Apps to learning cards. The student-facing text is usually repeated exactly in the downloadable Student Worksheet and repeated/mirrored in the Lesson Plan. Start with the student learning experience to develop student-facing language and concept load, then run readability check and revise, and finally paste back to the teacher Lesson Plan with any support teachers will need to facilitate learning.

The directions and number of steps below will vary according to project and student-facing content, but the progression from Engage to Evaluate will be similar. Students will engage, then build, then share their learning, then elaborate on it.

Lesson Feature

Content of the Feature

For apps

The App steps/cards often follow this basic pattern:

  1. Step 1: storyline + image – connect to the character and his/her problem

  2. Step 2: Engage – think about the character’s problem

  3. Step 3: Build something to solve that problem

  4. Step 4: Program the model to help solve that problem

  5. Step 5: Explain what you did and how it solves the problem

  6. Step 6: Extend and elaborate with a new challenge, plus possible discussion

  7. Step 7: Great job! <or other congratulatory text>

Some steps feature repeating/boilerplate images. Others are lesson-specific or vary only for the lesson mini-fig.

Step/Card 1:

This card/step presents the story to students with 1–2 sentences and a framing image, and leads them to their first challenge. It is referenced in the summary in the lesson plan Engage section.

  • The story offers the narrative entry into the story and invite students to join the minifig character or solve a problem for it, frames the specific challenge students will receive, and provides opportunities for social-emotional learning as students connect to the character’s situation and wants. The characters are assigned intentionally for coverage and to align with their biographies.

  • Stories are written at student language and cognitive level. When revising for subject-matter accuracy, readability, instructional coverage, or other minor reasons, maintain the purposes of the story, update it across its several appearances.

To consider whether to revise the storyline, review these requirements for it.

  • offers a narrative entry into the story

  • frames the specific challenge students will receive

  • provides opportunities for social-emotional learning as students connect to the character’s situation and wants.

  • fits with the mini-fig character bio in terms of wants, needs, preferences, and so on. Daniel uses a wheelchair, Maria likes music, and so on.

  • The story offers the narrative entry into the story and invite students to join the minifig character or solve a problem for it, frames the specific challenge students will receive, and provides opportunities for social-emotional learning as students connect to the character’s situation and wants. The characters are assigned intentionally for coverage and to align with their biographies.

We recommend that you make any storyline revisions first, then run readability check and revise, and finally paste back to the teacher Lesson Plan with any support teachers will need to facilitate learning.

Step/Card 2

  • This step encourages students to THINK about the main character’s problem. Write 1–3 questions/prompts in student-facing language and cognitive complexity. Then repeat them in the Engage section of the lesson plan, along with answers for the teacher.

  • Answers should be in student-facing complexity and language to the greatest extent possible so that teacher can share, but no readability is required. We recommend that you write the student questions first and work backwards to the lesson plan.

  • Image is often boilerplate though mini-fig WILL vary by lesson.

Step/Card 3

  • This step gives students their building challenge in response to the context/problem in Step 1 and the thinking in Step 2. It may also include building directions in a series of sub-steps.

  • Stay close to the challenge and the learning required for the standard. For example, if the model has to show parts of plants that support pollination, we try to ask for that without giving away the answer.

  • Write 1–3 sentence/steps in bulleted form using student-facing language and cognitive complexity. The building should respond to the challenge in Step 1 and flow from the thinking in Step 2. Then repeat the text in the Explore section of the lesson plan, in sentence form (no bullets).

  • Incorporate the key concept of this Step 3 build challenge in your summary in Engage.

  • Write the student text first and work backwards to the lesson plan.

  • Image will be lesson-specific related to the build.

Step/Card 4

  • This step gives students their programming challenge in response to the context/problem in Step 1 and the thinking in Step 2. Stay close to the challenge and the required learning in the standard. For example, if we want students to target the moment of pollination, we ask for that in the prompt.

  • Write 1-2 sentences that will support relate to the Explore programming step in the lesson plan; needn’t repeat 1:1 and shouldn’t repeat any boilerplate in the lesson plan syntax. Any sample programming stack will be provided to writers AND to students in the app.

  • If relevant, suggest what to program based on the specific building options, e.g. if you have used a motor in your model, look for the motor blocks

  • Image is lesson-specific.

  • We recommend that you write the student text first and work backwards to the lesson plan.

Step/Card 5

  • This step gives students their Explain challenge in response to the work they did in steps 3–4. It is often where the meat of the standard learning is demonstrated, so stay close to the challenge and its required learning. For example, if the standard requires students to build a model that shows x, y, z, here we ask them to explain how their models shows x, y, z. We are specific in what they must explain.

  • Write 1-3 sentences or questions in bulleted form to describe what students should EXPLAIN, then repeat it closely if not 1:1 in the Explain section of the lesson plan.

  • We recommend that you write the student text first and work backwards to the lesson plan.

  • Image is often boilerplate though mini-figs might vary.

Step/Card 6

  • This step offers students a way to extend their learning in the Elaborate step of the lesson through an additional challenge. The new challenge may cover an aspect of the standard not in the main part of the lesson or extend their learning beyond the lesson to related topics, aspects of the standard, or even their own lives.

  • Write 1–2 steps/questions and then repeat them in the Elaborate step in the Lesson Plan. Make sure that Elaborate bullet 1 includes any background students will need and keep the student-facing text VERY brief for target age cognitive load

  • Image is usually boilerplate, though mini-figs or position in the image could vary.

  • We recommend that you write the student text first and work backwards to the lesson plan.

Step/Card 7

  • Boilerplate text and image to say congratulations. For example, Great job!

  • Usually no action for editorial team

Additional Ressources

For a summary, see p. 2 in The BCSC 5E Instructional Model: Origins and Effectiveness; https://media.bscs.org/bscsmw/5es/bscs_5e_full_report.pdf